| Course Name |
Academic Skills in English I
|
|
Code
|
Semester
|
Theory
(hour/week) |
Application/Lab
(hour/week) |
Local Credits
|
ECTS
|
|
ENG 101
|
Fall
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
| Prerequisites |
None
|
|||||
| Course Language |
English
|
|||||
| Course Type |
Required
|
|||||
| Course Level |
First Cycle
|
|||||
| Mode of Delivery | - | |||||
| Teaching Methods and Techniques of the Course | DiscussionGroup WorkQ&ACritical feedbackLecture / Presentation | |||||
| National Occupation Classification | - | |||||
| Course Coordinator | ||||||
| Course Lecturer(s) |
|
|||||
| Assistant(s) | - | |||||
| Course Objectives | This course is designed to develop the academic language skills undergraduate students need to succeed across their degree programmes. The course equips students to read critically, write structured academic arguments, synthesise evidence from multiple sources, and engage with complex ideas in English. By grounding skills development in professionally relevant and intellectually challenging source texts, the course prepares students not only for ENG 102 but for the full range of academic communication demands they will encounter throughout their studies and careers. |
| Learning Outcomes |
The students who succeeded in this course;
|
| Course Description | The course develops the academic skills in English required for undergraduate study at B2 CEFR level. Through a flipped learning model combining pre-class digital modules with face-to-face sessions, students practise summarising, paraphrasing, synthesising, and arguing from a range of authentic academic sources drawn from social science, philosophy, media studies, and science communication. Students produce structured academic paragraphs and an essay, curate a learning portfolio, and develop the critical reading, responsible AI use, and reflective writing skills needed for ENG 102 and beyond. |
| Related Sustainable Development Goals |
|
|
Core Courses |
X
|
| Major Area Courses | ||
| Supportive Courses | ||
| Media and Management Skills Courses | ||
| Transferable Skill Courses |
| Week | Subjects | Related Preparation |
| 1 | Introduction to Course | No required reading. Complete Flipped Module 1 before Week 2 Session 1. |
| 2 | The Science of Belonging — Walton and Cohen (2011): What does the research say about belonging at university? Reading, annotating, and summarising an academic source. | Walton, G. M., and Cohen, G. L. (2011). A brief social-belonging intervention improves academic and health outcomes of minority students. Science, 331(6023), 1447–1451. |
| 3 | Future of Work and iGen — Twenge (2017): Sceptical reading and paraphrasing. What does the evidence actually show? | Twenge, J. M. (2017). Have smartphones destroyed a generation? The Atlantic. |
| 4 | Baloney Detection — Sagan (1996): Tools for evaluating any claim. Credibility, evidence, and the fine art of critical reading. | Sagan, C. (1996). The fine art of baloney detection. In The demon-haunted world (pp. 209–217). Ballantine Books. |
| 5 | Academic Integrity — Pecorari (2003): Patchwriting, paraphrase, and the difference between using sources and misrepresenting them. | Pecorari, D. (2003). Good and original: Plagiarism and patchwriting in academic second-language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(4), 317–345. Excerpt provided by instructor. |
| 6 | Grit and Perseverance — Duckworth et al. (2007) and WEF (2023): The CEE paragraph. Claim, evidence, explanation using two sources. | Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., and Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087–1101. |
| 7 | Statistics and Synthesis — Huff (1954) and IPCC (2023): Reading data critically. Synthesis across two sources from different domains. | Huff, D. (1954). How to lie with statistics. Norton. Chapter excerpt provided by instructor. IPCC (2023). Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Summary for Policymakers. |
| 8 | Midterm Week | No required materials. Review course sources from Weeks 2–8. |
| 9 | One Story Is Never Enough — Adichie (2009): Counterargument and rebuttal. The danger of a single narrative in academic argument. | Adichie, C. N. (2009). The danger of a single story [TED Talk transcript]. TED2009. |
| 10 | Ethics and the Essay — Singer (1972): Thesis statements and essay structure. Philosophical argument and its academic form. | Singer, P. (1972). Famine, affluence, and morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1(3), 229–243. |
| 11 | Can a Machine Be Creative? — Robinson (2006) and Sagan (1996) reused: AI in academic writing. Responsible use and baloney detection applied to AI output. | Robinson, K. (2006). Do schools kill creativity? [TED Talk transcript]. TED2006. |
| 12 | Revision is Writing: Three-level revision framework. Peer review workshop. Final essay introduction drafted in class. | No new source. Students bring their own writing from Weeks 6–11. |
| 13 | Portfolio Week — Moon (1999): Reflective writing. Portfolio curation. Vision statement and final assessment preparation. | Moon, J. (1999). Reflection in learning and professional development, Chapter 1 excerpt. Kogan Page. |
| 14 | From Student to Professional: Course synthesis. Student source presentations. Final essay submission guidance. Course close. | No required reading. Students bring one chosen course source and their completed e-portfolio. |
| 15 | Semester Review | |
| 16 | Final Exams |
| Course Notes/Textbooks | SFL Materials |
| Suggested Readings/Materials | Supplementary material to be prepared when necessary by the course instructors
|
| Semester Activities | Number | Weigthing |
| Participation |
1
|
10
|
| Laboratory / Application | ||
| Field Work | ||
| Quizzes / Studio Critiques |
1
|
10
|
| Portfolio | ||
| Homework / Assignments |
1
|
25
|
| Presentation / Jury | ||
| Project |
1
|
25
|
| Seminar / Workshop | ||
| Oral Exams | ||
| Midterm |
1
|
30
|
| Final Exam | ||
| Total |
| Weighting of Semester Activities on the Final Grade |
5
|
100
|
| Weighting of End-of-Semester Activities on the Final Grade | ||
| Total |
| Semester Activities | Number | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
|---|---|---|---|
| Theoretical Course Hours (Including exam week: 16 x total hours) |
16
|
2
|
32
|
| Laboratory / Application Hours (Including exam week: '.16.' x total hours) |
16
|
2
|
32
|
| Study Hours Out of Class |
14
|
1
|
14
|
| Field Work |
0
|
||
| Quizzes / Studio Critiques |
1
|
1
|
1
|
| Portfolio |
1
|
12
|
12
|
| Homework / Assignments |
12
|
1
|
12
|
| Presentation / Jury |
0
|
||
| Project |
0
|
||
| Seminar / Workshop |
0
|
||
| Oral Exam |
0
|
||
| Midterms |
1
|
3
|
3
|
| Final Exam |
0
|
||
| Total |
106
|
|
#
|
Program Competencies/Outcomes |
* Contribution Level
|
|||||
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|||
| 1 |
To be able to use the theoretical and practical knowledge acquired in the areas of Political Science and International Relations. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 2 |
To be able to have the basic knowledge of, and make use of other disciplines which contribute to the areas of Political Science and International Relations. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 3 |
To be able to distinguish the differences between classical and contemporary theories and to assess their relationship. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 4 |
To be able to recognize regional and global issues, and develop sustainable solutions based on research. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 5 |
To be able to assess the acquired knowledge and skills in the areas of Political Science and International Relations critically. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 6 |
To be able to transfer ideas and proposals on issues in the areas of Political Science and International Relations to other people and institutions verbally and in writing. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 7 |
To be able to identify the historical continuity and changes observed in the relations between the actors and institutions of national and international politics. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 8 |
To be able to examine concepts, theories, and developments with scientific methods in the areas of Political Science and International Relations. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 9 |
To be able to take responsibility as an individual and as a team member. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 10 |
To be able to act in accordance with the scientific and ethical values in studies related to Political Science and International Relations. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 11 |
To be able to collect data in the areas of Political Science and International Relations and communicate with colleagues in a foreign language ("European Language Portfolio Global Scale", Level B1). |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
|
| 12 |
To be able to speak a second foreign language at a medium level of fluency efficiently. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 13 |
To be able to relate the knowledge accumulated throughout human history to their field of experience. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest
As Izmir University of Economics transforms into a world-class university, it also raises successful young people with global competence.
More..Izmir University of Economics produces qualified knowledge and competent technologies.
More..Izmir University of Economics sees producing social benefit as its reason for existence.
More..