| Course Name |
Contemporary Political Theory
|
|
Code
|
Semester
|
Theory
(hour/week) |
Application/Lab
(hour/week) |
Local Credits
|
ECTS
|
|
PSIR 470
|
Fall/Spring
|
3
|
0
|
3
|
6
|
| Prerequisites |
None
|
|||||
| Course Language |
English
|
|||||
| Course Type |
Elective
|
|||||
| Course Level |
First Cycle
|
|||||
| Mode of Delivery | face to face | |||||
| Teaching Methods and Techniques of the Course | - | |||||
| National Occupation Classification | - | |||||
| Course Coordinator | - | |||||
| Course Lecturer(s) | - | |||||
| Assistant(s) | - | |||||
| Course Objectives | The primary purpose of this course is to introduce students to the theoretical controversies within contemporary political philosophy and to encourage them to consider ethical and political issues from a critical perspective. |
| Learning Outcomes |
The students who succeeded in this course;
|
| Course Description | Particular attention will be paid to contemporary disputes about freedom, public realm, justice, constitutional and radical democracy, populism, violence and democratic ethics within contemporary political theory. |
| Related Sustainable Development Goals |
|
|
Core Courses | |
| Major Area Courses |
X
|
|
| Supportive Courses | ||
| Media and Management Skills Courses | ||
| Transferable Skill Courses |
| Week | Subjects | Related Preparation |
| 1 | Introduction: Major Controversies in Contemporary Political Theory | |
| 2 | Liberal Freedom | Isaiah Berlin, “Two Concepts of Liberty”, Four Essays on Liberty (Oxford University Press, 1990) |
| 3 | Freedom and Public Realm | Hannah Arendt, “What is Freedom?” Between Past and Future (Penguin); Hannah Arendt, The Human Condition (University of Chicago Press, 1998), 175-247 |
| 4 | Constitutional Democracy | John Rawls, “The Idea of an Overlapping Consensus”, Political Liberalism (Columbia University Pres, 2005). |
| 5 | Struggles for Recognition | Jürgen Habermas, “Struggles for Recognition in the Democratic Constitutional State” in Gutmann, Multiculturalism (Princeton University Press, 1994), 107-147. |
| 6 | Radical/Participatory Democracy | Sheldon Wolin, “Fugitive Democracy”, Fugitive Democracy and Other Essays (Princeton University Press, 2016), 100-115. |
| 7 | Midterm I | |
| 8 | Populism as a Threat | Jan-Werner Müller, What is Populism? (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2016), 1-60. |
| 9 | Populism as Radical Democracy? | Chantal Mouffe, For a Left Populism (Verso, 2018), 1-60. |
| 10 | Violence and Politics | Frantz Fanon, “On Violence”, Wrethched of the Earth (Grove Press, 2004), 1-60. |
| 11 | Politics versus Violence | Hannah Arendt, “On Violence”, Crises of the Republic (Harcourt Brace & Company, 1972), 103-183. |
| 12 | Midterm II | |
| 13 | Democratic Ethics | Ella Myers, Worldly Ethics: Democratic Politics and Care for the World (Duke University Press, 2013), 85-139. |
| 14 | Documentary Film | |
| 15 | Concluding Remarks | |
| 16 | Final Exam |
| Course Notes/Textbooks | Required texts specified above.
*All course readings are available at the University Library and as open sources. |
| Suggested Readings/Materials |
| Semester Activities | Number | Weigthing |
| Participation |
1
|
10
|
| Laboratory / Application | ||
| Field Work | ||
| Quizzes / Studio Critiques | ||
| Portfolio | ||
| Homework / Assignments | ||
| Presentation / Jury | ||
| Project | ||
| Seminar / Workshop | ||
| Oral Exams | ||
| Midterm |
2
|
50
|
| Final Exam |
1
|
40
|
| Total |
| Weighting of Semester Activities on the Final Grade |
3
|
60
|
| Weighting of End-of-Semester Activities on the Final Grade |
1
|
40
|
| Total |
| Semester Activities | Number | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
|---|---|---|---|
| Theoretical Course Hours (Including exam week: 16 x total hours) |
16
|
3
|
48
|
| Laboratory / Application Hours (Including exam week: '.16.' x total hours) |
16
|
0
|
|
| Study Hours Out of Class |
12
|
3
|
36
|
| Field Work |
0
|
||
| Quizzes / Studio Critiques |
0
|
||
| Portfolio |
0
|
||
| Homework / Assignments |
0
|
||
| Presentation / Jury |
0
|
||
| Project |
0
|
||
| Seminar / Workshop |
0
|
||
| Oral Exam |
0
|
||
| Midterms |
2
|
30
|
60
|
| Final Exam |
1
|
25
|
25
|
| Total |
169
|
|
#
|
Program Competencies/Outcomes |
* Contribution Level
|
|||||
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|||
| 1 |
To be able to use the theoretical and practical knowledge acquired in the areas of Political Science and International Relations. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
|
| 2 |
To be able to have the basic knowledge of, and make use of other disciplines which contribute to the areas of Political Science and International Relations. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 3 |
To be able to distinguish the differences between classical and contemporary theories and to assess their relationship. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 4 |
To be able to recognize regional and global issues, and develop sustainable solutions based on research. |
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 5 |
To be able to assess the acquired knowledge and skills in the areas of Political Science and International Relations critically. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
|
| 6 |
To be able to transfer ideas and proposals on issues in the areas of Political Science and International Relations to other people and institutions verbally and in writing. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 7 |
To be able to identify the historical continuity and changes observed in the relations between the actors and institutions of national and international politics. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 8 |
To be able to examine concepts, theories, and developments with scientific methods in the areas of Political Science and International Relations. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 9 |
To be able to take responsibility as an individual and as a team member. |
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 10 |
To be able to act in accordance with the scientific and ethical values in studies related to Political Science and International Relations. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 11 |
To be able to collect data in the areas of Political Science and International Relations and communicate with colleagues in a foreign language ("European Language Portfolio Global Scale", Level B1). |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 12 |
To be able to speak a second foreign language at a medium level of fluency efficiently. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 13 |
To be able to relate the knowledge accumulated throughout human history to their field of experience. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest
As Izmir University of Economics transforms into a world-class university, it also raises successful young people with global competence.
More..Izmir University of Economics produces qualified knowledge and competent technologies.
More..Izmir University of Economics sees producing social benefit as its reason for existence.
More..