| Course Name |
The Political Theory of Federalism
|
|
Code
|
Semester
|
Theory
(hour/week) |
Application/Lab
(hour/week) |
Local Credits
|
ECTS
|
|
PSIR 462
|
Fall/Spring
|
3
|
0
|
3
|
6
|
| Prerequisites |
None
|
|||||
| Course Language |
English
|
|||||
| Course Type |
Elective
|
|||||
| Course Level |
First Cycle
|
|||||
| Mode of Delivery | face to face | |||||
| Teaching Methods and Techniques of the Course | DiscussionGroup WorkLecture / Presentation | |||||
| National Occupation Classification | - | |||||
| Course Coordinator | - | |||||
| Course Lecturer(s) | ||||||
| Assistant(s) | - | |||||
| Course Objectives | This course is designed to introduce students to the political theory of federalism with particular emphasis on three main objectives: to examine the historical origins, normative and political goals, and contemporary applications and varieties of federalism. |
| Learning Outcomes |
The students who succeeded in this course;
|
| Course Description | The main purpose of this course is to introduce students to the political theory of federalism. Particular attention is paid to the historical origins, central political goals, and normative foundations of federalism. “Self-rule” and “shared rule” are widely viewed as the twin objectives of federal partnerships in federalism studies. Why would the central government concede power to local units and vice versa? Are there asymmetrical arrangements in federal systems? How do they differ from symmetrical federal partnerships? What is the relation between federalism and democracy? What are the main differences between monist and pluralist visions of federalism? What are the challenges confronting multinational and multicultural federal democracies? What are the strengths and weaknesses of competing federal models? Do federal arrangements play a positive role in conflict management or resolution? The course aims to explore these questions through a guided reading of both classical and contemporary theoretical approaches to federalism. While it has a primarily theoretical focus, a substantial part of the course is devoted to the study and discussion of how federalism is practiced in different countries such as Spain, Canada, Germany, and Switzerland. |
| Related Sustainable Development Goals |
|
|
|
Core Courses | |
| Major Area Courses |
X
|
|
| Supportive Courses | ||
| Media and Management Skills Courses | ||
| Transferable Skill Courses |
| Week | Subjects | Related Preparation |
| 1 | Introduction: Federalism and Political Theory | Dimitrios Karmis & Wayne Norman, “The Revival of Federalism in Normative Political Theory”, in Theories of Federalism: A Reader, Dimitrios Karmis & Wayne Norman (eds.) (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2005), 3-21. Thomas Hueglin, “Federalism and Political Theory: A Case of Mutual Neglect?”, in A Research Agenda for Federalism Studies, John Kincaid (ed.) (Cheltenham: Elgar, 2019), 15-26. |
| 2 | The Moral and Political Foundations of American Federalism I | Hamilton, Jay, & Madison, “Federal Theory in The Federalist”, in Theories of Federalism: A Reader, Dimitrios Karmis & Wayne Norman (eds.) (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2005), 105-133. Iain Hampsher-Monk, “Democracy and Federation in the Federalist Papers”, Federal Democracies, Michael Burgess & Alain-G. Gagnon (London: Routledge, 2010), 29-45. |
| 3 | The Moral and Political Foundations of American Federalism II | Alexis de Tocqueville, “Federal Theory in Democracy in America”, in Theories of Federalism: A Reader, Dimitrios Karmis & Wayne Norman (eds.) (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2005), 147-63. James Schleifer, The Chicago Companion to Tocqueville’s Democracy in America (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012), 56-108. |
| 4 | Arendt’s (Con)Federal Vision: From America to Israel/Palestine | Hannah Arendt, “The Revolutionary Tradition and Its Lost Heritage”, On Revolution (Penguin, 1963). Hannah Arendt, “To Save the Jewish Homeland”, The Jewish Writings (Schocken, 2007), 388-401. |
| 5 | Karl Renner and National Cultural Autonomy: A Federal Model for Central Europe and Beyond | Karl Renner, “State and Nation”, in National Cultural Autonomy and Its Contemporary Critics, Ephraim Nimni (ed.) (London: Routledge, 2005), 13-40. Ephraim Nimni, “Introduction: The National Cultural Autonomy Model Revisited”, in National Cultural Autonomy and Its Contemporary Critics, Ephraim Nimni (ed.) (London: Routledge, 2005), 1-12. Rainer Bauböck, “Political Autonomy or Cultural Minority Rights?” in National Cultural Autonomy and Its Contemporary Critics, Ephraim Nimni (ed.) (London: Routledge, 2005), 83-95. |
| 6 | Varieties of Federal Polities | Ronald L. Watts, “Comparing Forms of Federal Partnerships”, in Theories of Federalism: A Reader, Dimitrios Karmis & Wayne Norman (eds.) (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2005), 233-253 |
| 7 | Federalism and Democracy | Alfred Stepan, “Federalism and Democracy: Beyond the U.S. Model”, in Theories of Federalism: A Reader, Dimitrios Karmis & Wayne Norman (eds.) (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2005), 255-268. Ronal L. Watts, “Comparative Reflections on Federalism and Democracy”, in Federal Democracies, Michael Burgess & Alain-G. Gagnon (eds.) (London: Routledge, 2010), 325-346. |
| 8 | Midterm | |
| 9 | Federalism, Multiculturalism, and Multinational Democracy | Will Kymlicka, “Federalism, Nationalism, and Multiculturalism”, in Theories of Federalism: A Reader, Dimitrios Karmis & Wayne Norman (eds.) (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2005), 269-291. James Tully, “Introduction”, in Multinational Democracies, Alain-G. Gagnon & James Tully (eds.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), 1-31. |
| 10 | The Spanish Case | Ferran Requejo, “Political Liberalism n Multinational States: The Legitimacy of Plural and Asymmetrical Federalism”, in Multinational Democracies, Alain-G. Gagnon & James Tully (eds.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), 110-132. Luis Moreno, “Ethnoterritorial Concurrence in Multinational Societies: The Spanish Communidas Autonomos”, in Multinational Democracies, Alain-G. Gagnon & James Tully (eds.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), 201-221. |
| 11 | Federalism in Canada | Michael Burgess, “Competing National Visions: Canada-Quebec Relations in a Comparative Perspective”, in Multinational Democracies, Alain-G. Gagnon & James Tully (eds.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), 257-273. Alain-G. Gagnon, “The Moral Foundation of Asymmetrical Federalism: A Normative Exploration of the Case of Quebec and Canada”, in Multinational Democracies, Alain-G. Gagnon & James Tully (eds.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), 319-337. |
| 12 | Federalism in Switzerland & Germany | Paolo Dardanelli, “Federal Democracy in Switzerland”, Federal Democracies, Michael Burgess & Alain-G. Gagnon (eds.) (London: Routledge, 2010), 142-159. Franz Gress, “Federalism and Democracy in the Federal Republic of Germany”, Federal Democracies, Michael Burgess & Alain-G. Gagnon (eds.) (London: Routledge, 2010), 178-201. |
| 13 | Federalism and Recognition Claims | Dimitrios Karmis & Alain-G. Gagnon, “Federalism, Federation and Collective Identities in Canada and Belgium: Different Routes, Similar Fragmentation”, in Multinational Democracies, Alain-G. Gagnon & James Tully (eds.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), 137-175. Pierre Coulombe, “Federalist Language Policies: The Cases of Canada and Spain”, in Multinational Democracies, Alain-G. Gagnon & James Tully (eds.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), 242-256. |
| 14 | Federalism and Conflict Resolution | Federalism and the Management of Conflict in Multinational Societies”, in Multinational Democracies, Alain-G. Gagnon & James Tully (eds.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), 338-364. Ephraim Nimni, “The Twilight of the Two-State Solution in Israel-Palestine: Shared Sovereignty and Nonterritorial Autonomy as the New Dawn”, Nationalities Papers 48 (2) (2020): 339-356. |
| 15 | Review | |
| 16 | Final Exam |
| Course Notes/Textbooks | Dimitrios Karmis & Wayne Norman (eds.) Theories of Federalism: A Reader (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2005), ISBN: 9780312295813. John Kincaid (ed.), A Research Agenda for Federalism Studies (Cheltenham: Elgar, 2019), ISBN: 9781788112963.
James Schleifer, The Chicago Companion to Tocqueville’s Democracy in America (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012), ISBN: 978-0226737034.
Hannah Arendt, On Revolution (Penguin, 1963), ISBN: 978-0143039907.
Hannah Arendt, The Jewish Writings (Schocken, 2007), ISBN: 978-0805211948. Michael Burgess & Alain-G. Gagnon (eds.), Federal Democracies (London: Routledge, 2010), ISBN: 9780415555487. Alain-G. Gagnon & James Tully (eds.) Multinational Democracies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), ISBN: 0521 800293. Ephraim Nimni (ed.), National Cultural Autonomy and Its Contemporary Critics (London: Routledge, 2005), ISBN: 0415249643. |
| Suggested Readings/Materials |
| Semester Activities | Number | Weigthing |
| Participation |
1
|
10
|
| Laboratory / Application | ||
| Field Work | ||
| Quizzes / Studio Critiques | ||
| Portfolio | ||
| Homework / Assignments | ||
| Presentation / Jury |
1
|
30
|
| Project | ||
| Seminar / Workshop | ||
| Oral Exams | ||
| Midterm |
1
|
30
|
| Final Exam |
30
|
|
| Total |
| Weighting of Semester Activities on the Final Grade |
3
|
70
|
| Weighting of End-of-Semester Activities on the Final Grade |
1
|
30
|
| Total |
| Semester Activities | Number | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
|---|---|---|---|
| Theoretical Course Hours (Including exam week: 16 x total hours) |
16
|
3
|
48
|
| Laboratory / Application Hours (Including exam week: '.16.' x total hours) |
16
|
0
|
|
| Study Hours Out of Class |
12
|
3
|
36
|
| Field Work |
0
|
||
| Quizzes / Studio Critiques |
0
|
||
| Portfolio |
0
|
||
| Homework / Assignments |
0
|
||
| Presentation / Jury |
1
|
2,5
|
2
|
| Project |
0
|
||
| Seminar / Workshop |
0
|
||
| Oral Exam |
0
|
||
| Midterms |
1
|
20
|
20
|
| Final Exam |
40
|
0
|
|
| Total |
106
|
|
#
|
Program Competencies/Outcomes |
* Contribution Level
|
|||||
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|||
| 1 |
To be able to use the theoretical and practical knowledge acquired in the areas of Political Science and International Relations. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
|
| 2 |
To be able to have the basic knowledge of, and make use of other disciplines which contribute to the areas of Political Science and International Relations. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 3 |
To be able to distinguish the differences between classical and contemporary theories and to assess their relationship. |
X
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 4 |
To be able to recognize regional and global issues, and develop sustainable solutions based on research. |
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 5 |
To be able to assess the acquired knowledge and skills in the areas of Political Science and International Relations critically. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
|
| 6 |
To be able to transfer ideas and proposals on issues in the areas of Political Science and International Relations to other people and institutions verbally and in writing. |
X
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 7 |
To be able to identify the historical continuity and changes observed in the relations between the actors and institutions of national and international politics. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 8 |
To be able to examine concepts, theories, and developments with scientific methods in the areas of Political Science and International Relations. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 9 |
To be able to take responsibility as an individual and as a team member. |
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 10 |
To be able to act in accordance with the scientific and ethical values in studies related to Political Science and International Relations. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 11 |
To be able to collect data in the areas of Political Science and International Relations and communicate with colleagues in a foreign language ("European Language Portfolio Global Scale", Level B1). |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 12 |
To be able to speak a second foreign language at a medium level of fluency efficiently. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
| 13 |
To be able to relate the knowledge accumulated throughout human history to their field of experience. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest
As Izmir University of Economics transforms into a world-class university, it also raises successful young people with global competence.
More..Izmir University of Economics produces qualified knowledge and competent technologies.
More..Izmir University of Economics sees producing social benefit as its reason for existence.
More..