FACULTY OF BUSINESS
Department of Political Science and International Relations
GEHU 204 | Course Introduction and Application Information
Course Name |
Fundamentals of Philosophy
|
Code
|
Semester
|
Theory
(hour/week) |
Application/Lab
(hour/week) |
Local Credits
|
ECTS
|
GEHU 204
|
Fall/Spring
|
3
|
0
|
3
|
6
|
Prerequisites |
None
|
|||||
Course Language |
English
|
|||||
Course Type |
Service Course
|
|||||
Course Level |
First Cycle
|
|||||
Mode of Delivery | - | |||||
Teaching Methods and Techniques of the Course | - | |||||
Course Coordinator | - | |||||
Course Lecturer(s) | ||||||
Assistant(s) | - |
Course Objectives | To provide an introduction to the fundamental concepts and argumentative strategies of philosophy through an investigation of the question “What is a rational animal?” in relation to logic, epistemology, ethics, and political philosophy. |
Learning Outcomes |
The students who succeeded in this course;
|
Course Description |
|
Core Courses | |
Major Area Courses | ||
Supportive Courses | ||
Media and Management Skills Courses | ||
Transferable Skill Courses |
WEEKLY SUBJECTS AND RELATED PREPARATION STUDIES
Week | Subjects | Related Preparation |
1 | Presentation and overview of the course; discussion of how to begin philosophy by acknowledging that we have already begun. | Overview and discussion of a number of dilemmas and paradoxes. |
2 | Plato | Apology |
3 | What is an argument? The concepts of validity, truth and soundness. Types of justification; types of refutation: by parallel reasoning, counter-examples, reductio ad absurdum. | R. Fogelin, Understanding Arguments, pp 45-53 and pp. 405-433. |
4 | Fallacies of vacuity: circular reasoning, question-begging; fallacies of relevance: ad hominem, straw man, false cause, appeals to authority | Fogelin, pp. 477-405 |
5 | The Chinese Room Argument: Can Computers think? Discussion of artificial intelligence. | Turing, A., 1948, ‘Intelligent Machinery: A Report’, London: National Physical Laboratory; Searle, J., 1980, ‘Minds, Brains and Programs’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3: 417–57 |
6 | MIDTERM | |
7 | Introduction to epistemology | Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy, Meditation 1 and 2 |
8 | Skepticism, sources of knowledge, methodic doubt, certainty as epistemic criterion, the cogito as first principle and model of | Descartes, Meditations 2 (contn’d) and 3 |
9 | Philosophy and science: the thinking subject as embodied being subject to the laws of nature. FIRST PAPER DUE | Janet Richards, Human Nature After Darwin, pp. 4-25 FIRST PAPER DUE |
10 | Evolutionary biology as philosophical challenge and answer to the question “What is a rational animal?” | Richards, pp. 25-51 |
11 | Determinism, freedom of the will, morality as a scientific problem and science as a moral problem | Richards, pp. 126-154 |
12 | Consequentialism (Utilitarianism) and Deontology: arguments and criticisms | Kant, pp. 274-281; Bennett, pp. 294-306; Bentham, pp. 306-312; Williams pp. 339-345; M. L. K. Jr., Letter from Birmingham Jail. |
13 | Moral Psychology and Perspectivism. | Nietzsche, On the Genealogy of Morals, essays I and II. |
14 | The responsibilities and the problems of rational thought; the rational animal and the polis. | Aristotle, Politics, Bk. 1 1986-2000; Locke, 249-253; Bentham and Mill, 270-274 Levi, If This is a Man. |
15 | Week 14 cont’d. SECOND PAPER DUE. | Levi, Contn’d. |
16 | Final |
Course Notes/Textbooks | |
Suggested Readings/Materials |
EVALUATION SYSTEM
Semester Activities | Number | Weigthing |
Participation | ||
Laboratory / Application | ||
Field Work | ||
Quizzes / Studio Critiques |
1
|
35
|
Portfolio | ||
Homework / Assignments |
1
|
30
|
Presentation / Jury | ||
Project | ||
Seminar / Workshop | ||
Oral Exams | ||
Midterm |
1
|
35
|
Final Exam | ||
Total |
Weighting of Semester Activities on the Final Grade |
3
|
100
|
Weighting of End-of-Semester Activities on the Final Grade | ||
Total |
ECTS / WORKLOAD TABLE
Semester Activities | Number | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
---|---|---|---|
Theoretical Course Hours (Including exam week: 16 x total hours) |
16
|
3
|
48
|
Laboratory / Application Hours (Including exam week: '.16.' x total hours) |
16
|
0
|
|
Study Hours Out of Class |
16
|
3
|
48
|
Field Work |
0
|
||
Quizzes / Studio Critiques |
1
|
0
|
|
Portfolio |
0
|
||
Homework / Assignments |
1
|
0
|
|
Presentation / Jury |
0
|
||
Project |
0
|
||
Seminar / Workshop |
0
|
||
Oral Exam |
0
|
||
Midterms |
1
|
20
|
20
|
Final Exam |
22
|
0
|
|
Total |
116
|
COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM QUALIFICATIONS RELATIONSHIP
#
|
Program Competencies/Outcomes |
* Contribution Level
|
||||
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
||
1 | To be able to use the theoretical and practical knowledge acquired in the areas of Political Science and International Relations. |
|||||
2 | To be able to have the basic knowledge of, and make use of other disciplines which contribute to the areas of Political Science and International Relations. |
|||||
3 | To be able to distinguish the differences between classical and contemporary theories and to assess their relationship. |
|||||
4 | To be able to recognize regional and global issues, and develop solutions based on research. |
|||||
5 | To be able to assess the acquired knowledge and skills in the areas of Political Science and International Relations critically. |
|||||
6 | To be able to transfer ideas and proposals on issues in the areas of Political Science and International Relations to other people and institutions verbally and in writing. |
|||||
7 | To be able to identify the historical continuity and changes observed in the relations between the actors and institutions of national and international politics. |
|||||
8 | To be able to examine concepts, theories, and developments with scientific methods in the areas of Political Science and International Relations. |
|||||
9 | To be able to take responsibility as an individual and as a team member. |
|||||
10 | To be able to act in accordance with the scientific and ethical values in studies related to Political Science and International Relations. |
|||||
11 | To be able to collect data in the areas of Political Science and International Relations and communicate with colleagues in a foreign language ("European Language Portfolio Global Scale", Level B1). |
|||||
12 | To be able to speak a second foreign at a medium level of fluency efficiently. |
|||||
13 | To be able to relate the knowledge accumulated throughout human history to their field of experience. |
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest
NEWS |ALL NEWS
Sıtkı Egeli participated as a guest speaker at the HCOC Seminar
Faculty member of IUE Political Science and International Relations, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sıtkı Egeli participated as a guest speaker at the HCOC
Umut Can Adısönmez's New Article Published in the Journal "Critical Studies on Security"
Faculty member of IUE Political Science and International Relations, Dr. Umut Can Adısönmez and Assoc. Prof. Laçin İdil Öztığ from Yıldız Technical
Dr. Bengü Aydın Dikmen's new book "İnkılabı Nakşedecek Resimler" is published!
Bengü Aydın Dikmen focuses on the painting policy during the foundation and construction period of the Republic. In this way, she also
Serhun Al and Umut Can Adısönmez Lectured on Conflict Resolution and Peace Building
Faculty member of IUE Political Science and International Relations, Dr. Serhun Al and Dr. Umut Can Adısönmez, participated as trainers in the
Umut Can Adısönmez participated in the "Human Security and Resilience in South East Europe" Panel
Faculty member of IUE Political Science and International Relations, Dr. Umut Can Adısönmez participated in the panel discussion "Human Security and Resilience
We Organized Our Republican Centennial Symposium
As the IUE Political Science and International Relations Department, we organized a symposium on the Centennial of our republic. In the symposium
Batıkan Bulut presented his proceeding on the CEST 2023 Paris Symposium
Research assistant of the IUE Department of Political Science and International Relations, Batıkan Bulut presented his paper titled "Civil Society and Competitive